BMW Z4 Roadster Black with Black Leather

BMW Z4 3.0i Convertible, black with black interior. This vehicle is nicely equipped with heated seats, automatic transmission.

Beware the Bandwagon: Android Attracting More Apps than iOS

Android has been dominating mobile industry news cycles this week with the release of ABI Research’s report on smartphone app downloads...

Combine Routine and Dynamite Products for Back-To-School Health

This proprietary formula of targeted minerals assists a person’s immune system to build, repair, and stabilize itself. It consists of zinc, copper, selenium.

download the computer program

You can download such note, assignment, software and anything in 'download'

IBM Smarter Computing Blog

Cloud, analytics and mobile aren’t just changing the way you compute, they’re changing the way you do business with customers.

Welcome to our website. The Best Global Products.

We at Global Products would like to welcome you to our newly redesigned website. We have taken great care to update and improve all of the information on this site and will continue to work aggressively on updating the site to keep you better informed about Global Products and to provide essential information in an easy to use way

.would enjoy hearing your feedback on the new site and take any suggestions you may have. Visit our website feedback form to tell us how we’re doing! At the same time, we invite you to interact with us at various social media sites. We are now on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube!

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

International technical standards needed to accelerate IoT growth



internet-of-things-global.jpg

International standards are needed for the Internet of Things (IoT) in order to accelerate growth in industrial and manufacturing environments, particularly among small to medium-sized businesses.
"We need to get to global standards in the Industrial Internet Consortium [IIC]. Ensure the architectures are aligned and ideas and standards are being promoted at the same time," said Hans Jörg Stotz, senior vice president of IoT products and innovation at SAP.
Earlier this year, SAP announced that it partnered with Bosch to create a European IoT testbed to try to develop standards to connect sensors, machines, moving assets, and facilities to permeate all layers of the industrial IoT stack.
Other partners in the testbed are Dassault Systemes of France and Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) of India. TCS is doing the data acquisition, and Bosch provides energy components, and is continuously collecting data from all the machinery in the plant, generating a stream of information about the electricity consumed in the process of manufacturing. Dassault 3D Experience Platform brings a multidimensional representation of all the plant's machinery and functions, and SAP provides a platform and database for predictive analytics and big data.
Having international standards in place will mean that data coming from the IoT machines will be consistently identified, and mapped in the same way, whether that's data about usage, or when the machine needs maintenance. Right now, most companies are mapping data manually, and it takes so much time and costs so much in personnel labor that many small to medium-sized companies aren't able to afford it, Stotz said.
"We're pushing hard for semantic standards, so that machines identify themselves. The trick is at the end of the day to identify the vast amount of things out there which could at some point talk to the system," Stotz said.



Matt Jennings, regional president of the Americas for Bosch Software Innovations, said, "There are probably thousands of standards. I think as we look at IoT going forward, we want to eliminate some complexity of connectivity, and we need to discuss ways to do this."
Jennings explained that developing standards is really about "developing best practices," and the more complex standards are, the more it can cost a company to follow all of them, particularly in a manufacturing environment.
"Having common reference architecture for various types of industry use cases or solutions would speed up the opportunities for the organization to implement these types of solutions and it will make them less expensive to maintain," Jennings said. "I also think it will probably speed innovation because there will be a common way to look at things."
Nils Herzberg, senior vice president and global co-lead for the Internet of Things at SAP, said, "Most sensors are stupid. They do not describe themselves to the Internet of Things. Most cars do not say, 'I'm a Chrysler 200 and my serial number is...'. It would be helpful if the machines could volunteer this information, and the Internet of Things would describe itself to itself."
A standardized language would help make sense of industrial data. Sanjay Khatri, director of product marketing and IoT services for Jasper, which was acquired by Cisco earlier this year, said, "Those sensors and those devices that are being embedded into the industrial assets and all of the equipment that's being used in an industrial context, you want to make sure that those are standardized. If you're a car manufacturer like GM, you have manufacturing equipment on the factory floor, but you also have forklifts and you have various different types of other equipment within your manufacturing operation that you're using to run your entire operation. You want to make sure that there is some level of standardization so that when you collect all that data into a central repository you can get a consistent view."
While there are some standards in place, such as the OPC UA, an industrial M2M communication protocol, they aren't sufficient for international IoT use.
Stotz said, "What we are developing here isn't new and unrelated to all standards. OPC UA is a standard that could easily implement the ideas that are currently being discussed in the German platform industry. We believe that existing standards could extend and adopt the ideas being brought forward."
"From a Cisco perspective, we totally agree," said Paul Didier, solutions architect manager for
Cisco's IoT solutions group. "We're working really hard to make sure that those standards exist."
Didier said, "It's really clear there's a lot of value in IoT. A lot of people will say, 'f I had the data, I could do this, I could do that, I could do a lot of amazing things.' That first part of the sentence, 'if I had the data,' is one of the biggest hurdles. Many of these industrial environments are using segmented, proprietary networks that don't communicate with other networks. Anything in there is a challenge to deliver with industrial IoT networks if they remain unmerged."
"Even in sub-verticals like manufacturing for industrial IoT there's a lot of work that needs to be done about trying to simplify and make sense of all these different protocols," he said.
Stotz said, "At the end of the day, I think IoT will only become real if we have standards. Otherwise the small suppliers will not be able to enter the game."

Three takeaways for TechRepublic readers:

  1. International standards are needed to fuel IoT industrial growth particularly among smaller companies.
  2. SAP and Bosch have partnered to create a European testbed for IoT to accelerate growth.
  3. Existing standards such as OPC UA could be modified and reworked to serve as a base for new international standards.

Why haven't we seen the smartphone security apocalypse in iPhone and Android yet?

Mobile phones present a ripe attack vector for hackers, but so far we've avoided the nightmares of Windows 95. Is it just a matter of time?
phonelock.jpg

Finally, the mobile security apocalypse is upon us. A recent BBC headline warned: "Android bug fear in 900 million phones." For those of us who lived through Windows 95, widespread, catastrophic malware and security vulnerabilities were the norm, not the exception, which is why one of life's great mysteries has been the apparent absence of massive mobile security threats.
Despite everyone carrying around multitudinous attack vectors 24/7, when was the last time a friend or family member called you up to ask how to remove a virus on their phone? Something like the extremely destructive Chernobyl virus that plagued Windows 95? Probably never. Yet, that was a routine occurrence in the early days of the desktop.
But, according to a new MobileIron report, enterprises are about to get a severe wake-up call as "The velocity of mobile attacks is increasing," but a mere 8% of enterprises are enforcing OS updates to keep employee phones secure.

What, me worry?

Security is one of those things that only seems obvious in retrospect. Intuitively we know that mobile security must be an issue, with billions of phones in circulation. Yet, as individuals and employers, we do very little about it.
For many of us, we haven't needed to. Apple's iOS, for example, is a closed system that has made it difficult for hackers to crack its security. However,according to noted security expert Eugene Kaspersky, iOS' closed nature is actually the very thing that makes it most problematic:
[T]he most dangerous scenario, I am afraid, is with iPhones. It's less probable because it is very difficult to develop malware for iPhones, because the [operating] system is closed [for outside programmers]. But, every system has a vulnerability. If it happens—in the worst case scenario, if millions of the devices are infected—there is no antivirus, because antivirus companies don't have any rights to develop true end-point security [for Apple].
Given that MobileIron found that 81% of devices used in the enterprise are iOS, this could portend trouble. Even so, it is Android, not iOS, that gets targeted 92% of the time, according to a 2013 Juniper Networks study.
Regardless, the problem for enterprises is that they seem to exercise very little control over the mobile devices on their networks, as Conner Forrest reportedon MobileIron's findings:
  • 40% of companies had missing devices, up from 33% in Q4 2015;
  • 27% of companies had out-of-date policies, up from 20% in Q4 2015; and
  • 8% of companies were enforcing OS updates, which was comparable to Q4 2015.
Personal devices on corporate networks
This isn't so hard to understand when we remember the personal nature of mobile devices. Back in the days of the Chernobyl virus, "personal computers" were often paid for by their companies. Today, Gartner estimates that 40% of all "enterprise devices" are actually personal smartphones and laptops, and I'd wager that the percentage of personal smartphones in use is actually significantly higher.





After all, even if the enterprise buys the phone, I've seen plenty of employees skirt mobile device management policies to be able to use "their" phone as they choose. Mobile is personal, and individuals will go to great lengths to keep their mobile devices off of IT's radar...
...though not off the network. And that's where the risks lie.
In an increasingly connected and interconnected world, everything—including our lighting systems—creates a potential attack vector. While it would be nice to believe that widespread malware attacks are a thing of the desktop past, that would also be incredibly naive, given how tempting today's targets are.
Many of us (myself included), remember when the desktop was ripe with Chernobyl virus-like attacks. It would be foolish to believe that we're not headed there on our mobile devices, too, though in a much bigger way. And yet, we still haven't had a Chernobyl. The question is, "Why?"

What do you think?

I'd love to hear your thoughts. Are we headed for another Chernobyl-like virus in mobile? What is the biggest threat mobile presents in the enterprise? Share your thoughts in the comments or on Twitter.

Sunday, 7 August 2016

Nissan up the EV design game with new model

Aside from a couple distinctiv

Facebook continues push to be more like Snapchat with new camera feature


In its bid to become more like Snapchat, Facebook is finally putting its MSQRD acquisition to good use.
The social network is testing a new feature that puts a Snapchat-like camera at the top of News Feed, allowing users to add filters and animations to their selfies. The test is limited to users in Canda and Brazil right now and will feature content celebrating the Olympics. 
The test is powered by MSQRD, the Snapchat-like app for video filters Facebook acquired earlier this year. 
Users in Brazil and Canada will see a prompt to "celebrate the Olympic Games" using the new camera feature. Launching the camera allows you to add filters and "masks" (MSQRD's name for the Snapchat-like lenses) to their photos, which they can then share across Facebook. 

The feature is only an experiment for now and whether or not Facebook expands it to more people in more countries will likely depend on how it's received during the initial testing period. The test is also notable in that it marks MSQRD's formal debut in a Facebook product. Even if it's not successful though, this will not be the last time we see the company integrate MSQRD into one of its services, as Facebook previously announced it would integrate MSQRD's filterswith its live streaming platform.
The test also comes on the heels of Instagram's new Stories feature, which many see as its most blatant attempt at copying Snapchat yet. (Facebook says both Instagram Stories and this latest test in News Feed are all part of its current strategy to put video front and center in as many places as it can.)
But Facebook may find the feature to be a hard sell with users who may be growing weary of the network's repeated attempts at cloning Snapchat. The company previously launched (and shuttered) two standalone apps that were Snapchat clones. It also made efforts to build similar features into its main apps, testing a Snapchat-like feature called Quick Updates that it decided not to launch. And a report earlier this year suggested Facebook is working on yet anotherstandalone camera app to get more users to share photo and video.

LinkedIn reports revenue gains ahead of Microsoft merger

In this Jan. 28, 2011 file photo, the exterior view of LinkedIn headquarters is shown in Mountain View, Calif. Professional networking website LinkedIn Corp. plans to sell shares to investors for $32 to $35 each in an initial public offering, one of the first for a major U.S. social networking site.

Despite selling out for a cool $26.2 billion two months back, LinkedIn still has a job to do.

And it did just fine. 
The professional social network reported second-quarter earnings that beat analysts' expectations in revenue, driven by growth in new members and subscribers. 
But its results also included its largest net loss since going public in 2011. LinkedIn reported a loss of 89 cents per share compared to 53 cents the year prior. Excluding expenses, earnings per share of $1.13 would have beaten expectations of 78 cents per share. 
The stock increased by 0.25 percent in after-hours trading. 
LinkedIn posted revenue of $933 million, up 31 percent year over year. That figure beat expectations of $898 million.
Talent solutions — a package of recruiting tools and LinkedIn's biggest revenue stream — pulled in $597 million, a 35 percent increase year over year. 
LinkedIn credited sponsored content with bolstering its growth in marketing solutions, which brought in $181 million in the quarter.
The network also reported 450 million members for the second quarter. That's up from 433 million in April and a 18 percent increase from the year prior. 
Even with the dominance of Facebook for consumers' attention on mobile, more people are spending more time on LinkedIn. Pageviews per visitor are up 21 percent year over year. 
“Continued product innovation drove increased levels of engagement, and strengthened our enterprise offerings," LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner said in a statement. 
LinkedIn did not share outlook on the rest of 2016 due to the pending merger. The deal, the largest for Microsoft and in recent history of tech company mergers, still needs to gain regulatory approval.
Microsoft, who reportedly beat Facebook, Google and Salesforce on the deal, paid about a 50 percent premium on the company's share price. LinkedIn's stock and outlook had been falling and disappointing investors over the last year. 
"We believe joining forces with Microsoft enables us to further accelerate and scale our ability to deliver value and create economic opportunity for every member of the global workforce," Weiner said.
LinkedIn has been releasing new features prior to the merger. On Tuesday, the company announced its group of 500 influencers could post videos to the platform. 
Because who doesn't like video. 

New drone footage is the best look yet at Apple's enormous 'Spaceship' campus

New drone footage shows Apple's Campus 2 under major development in Cupertino, California. Viewers can really see the immensity of it all, with everything from a 100,000-square-foot fitness center, a 2 million-square-foot parking garage and quite a few different research and development centers. 
The drone flies over what appear to be rooftop basketball and tennis courts, which will be built in front of the main "spaceship" building. And you can see the new North Tantau auditorium, a 120,000-square-foot, $161 million glass-enclosed auditorium with seating for 1,000. Expect to see future Apple unveilings there. 
The 2.8-million-square-foot spaceship structure, the main circular building that will surround most of the other structures, is also bigger and more developed than we've seen before. It's come a long way since our look at it in March (see below)
There's also a lot going on with the surrounding terrain. You can see a dirt pyramid that's being used to cover different buildings, and a lot of land mid-landscaping. 
The video also shows Apple's future clean energy generators, as the drone flies over solar panels, fuel cells lining the garage and generators powered by renewable energy. 
While the project has experienced a few delays, it is expected to open in 2017 and cost $5 billion. Norman Foster, the architect behind the Reichstag and the Hearst Tower, is designing the facility. 

Facebook just ruined Instagram



About two weeks ago, while I was busy Snapchatting all the people at the park playing Pokémon Go, I wondered for a hot second why Instagram doesn't let you add text, drawings and emoji to your posts.
Then I chuckled at what a stupid idea that would be.
Turns out it's not such a stupid idea, seeing as Instagram just copied the crap out of Snapchat. 
For Instagram's parent company Facebook (and CEO Mark Zuckerberg), it's the ultimate f*ck you to Snapchat after failing to kill the app several times with its own unsuccessful clones — andfailing to buy outright buy the rival app.
Well, Zuckerberg's having the last laugh now, because his company basically just declared waron Snapchat.
I can just picture Zuckerberg wearing his robe hacker hoodie, sitting in some evil underground lair, finger-tenting Mr. Burns-style, as he watches a wall of screens showing Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel freaking out.
While Facebook and all the olds who can't figure Snapchat out are celebrating, it's now very apparent to me that Instagram is a trojan horse.
Whatever popular features Facebook wants — and if it fails to gain traction either through its own clone or through an acquisition — it'll use Instagram's large, influential install base to get it.
Instagram is becoming a bloated everything app because the cool kids aren't on Facebook. Facebook is skating to where the eyeballs are, which is Instagram, in order to slay Snapchat.
From this moment on, things will never be the same for Instagram.

Different apps for different content

Instagram is great precisely because it's not Snapchat and Snapchat is great because it's notInstagram.
The two apps offer different experiences. And I carve out time for both of them because they don't compete.
I go to Instagram to look at beautiful photography. And I go to Snapchat to ghost in on my friends' lives through Snapchat Stories, like some kind of creep looking through a digital peep hole.
On the creation side, it's the same deal:

What is Instagram anymore?

By cloning Snapchat's Stories, Instagram is now an app trying to please everyone.
People who don't use Snapchat but do use Instagram will be exposed to it. People who can't grasp Snapchat but understand Instagram will be more inclined to learn how to use Instagram Stories just because they'll internalize that it's easier by association, even if it's not. And people who use both Instagram and Snapchat may find themselves starting to favor one over the other, most likely the one where all their friends are on. (Facebook is betting it's on Instagram).
Contrary to popular belief, I'm open to change when it makes sense. But this one is such a paradigm shift in Instagram's focus that I may just quit this app before it becomes a sh*t sandwich of everything mashed into one.
I don't need two Snapchats. One is enough. And it's already on my phone's main homescreen. Remember how difficult it was to manage a Facebook and a Google+ identity? Facebook eventually won out.
Oh, and you probably already know this, but Instagram is about to become the battery hogging bastard that Snapchat is: